War on Lebanon: 'Defense' or Decades of Hegemony?
📰 THE STORY: Al Jazeera reports on continued Israeli bombardment of southern Lebanon, following earlier daytime attacks, presenting it as an ongoing exchange of aggression in the region. 🔍 WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: This isn't a new development. In 1982, Israel launched 'Operation Peace for Galilee,' invading Lebanon and occupying areas for 18 years, leading to an
estimated 20,000 deaths and the brutal Sabra and Shatila massacre. The 2006 Israeli war on Lebanon also killed over 1,191 Lebanese, predominantly civilians, and destroyed critical infrastructure. The very presence of Hezbollah, which Israel cites as justification for its attacks, emerged directly from the 1982 invasion as a resistance movement against occupation. Double Standard: Western media
often frames Israeli actions as 'retaliatory' or 'defensive,' while resistance from Hezbollah (a political party and social service provider in Lebanon, not just a militant group) is universally labeled 'terrorism.' Imagine if Mexico, after decades of US incursions, formed a border security force, only to have the US label it 'terrorist' for defending its sovereignty. Sanctions imposed on Lebanon,
exacerbated by ongoing assaults, are framed as internal failures, not consequences of persistent external aggression. Follow the Money: The military-industrial complex reaps massive profits. The United States provides Israel with $3.8 billion in military aid annually, ensuring a steady supply of advanced weaponry used in these bombardments. Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon see their stock