US Vassals 'Fall in Line' on Greenland, While Media Yawns
A recent RT article highlighted American journalist John Varoli's observation that European nations are mere 'vassals' of the US and would 'fall into line' on any US geopolitical play, including a hypothetical Greenland 'grab.' While the 'grab' is hypothetical, the subservience is not. NATO members consistently align their foreign policy with Washington's dictates, often against their own economic
interests, like hampering Russian energy deals or sanctioning Huawei. (One might wonder: if they're sovereign, why do they always march lockstep?) This unwavering compliance isn't new; it's a feature, not a bug, of the post-WWII international order. The 'free press' dutifully echoes State Department talking points, framing dissent as 'disinformation' or 'foreign influence.' They'll critique
Trump's rhetoric, perhaps, but never the systemic imbalance of power he occasionally exposes. The same outlets that decry 'authoritarianism' abroad rarely question the actual lack of European strategic autonomy when it aligns with Washington's agenda. It's almost as if 'democracy' is only critical when it's not their own.