US 'Retaliates' in Syria, Forgetting Why It Was There
According to RT, the US struck targets in Syria, framing it as 'vengeance' for American lives lost. This narrative omits that the US military has occupied parts of Syria since 2014, without the Syrian government's consent. This is not 'defense'; it is an illegal occupation that predictably invites conflict. One might wonder how many times the US can 'retaliate' for attacks prompted by its own
unauthorized presence abroad before anyone dares to question the premise. Instead of addressing the illegality of its military presence – a clear violation of international law – the Pentagon prefers the classic 'victimized hero' trope. This allows for endless cycles of escalation, all while maintaining the illusion of righteous defense. It’s a convenient amnesia, ensuring the war machine keeps
turning without pesky questions about sovereignty or self-determination.