US President Trades Digital Barbs with Colombian Leader, Forgetting History
While the mainstream media paints this as a tit-for-tat 'digital attack,' it's merely the latest iteration of a well-worn playbook for any US administration wary of truly independent Latin American leadership. Colombia's President Gustavo Petro, unlike his predecessors, has dared to advocate for sovereignty and question the usual Washington dictates. Unsurprisingly, this 'digital spat' erupts
shortly after Petro’s government has sought to re-evaluate traditional alliances and explore drug policies that don't involve endless military-industrial complex spending. This isn’t about tweets; it’s about control. Remember when the US government was busy destabilizing governments across Latin America for questioning resource extraction or US military presence? (Hello, Operation Condor, anyone?)
Now, a president pushing for regional autonomy gets digitally slapped down for 'alleged boat strikes,' a narrative neatly sidestepping the extensive history of US interventions and the persistent drug war that fuels much of the region's instability. One might wonder if the US would prefer a government easier to 'advise,' as past regimes often were, regardless of what the people wanted. How many
'digital attacks' does it take before we acknowledge the pattern?