US President Considers Invading NATO Ally for Real Estate Deal
Bloomberg reports that the White House won't rule out military force to acquire Greenland. Apparently, some nations are sovereign and others are merely 'on the market.' It's a striking echo of past US 'negotiations' where military might served as the ultimate leverage, often cloaked in economic terms. (See: Panama Canal, for a prior example of 'persuasion.') The audacity here isn't just the threat
against a NATO ally; it's the casual reassertion of a colonial-era grab playbook, dusted off for modern times. Of course, the same media outlets that blanch at this particular suggestion rarely question the 'necessity' of endlessly supplying weapons to fund Israeli military actions in Gaza. Funny how the principle of national sovereignty is selectively applied: sacred when it's an economic rival
or a strategic asset, but mere paperwork when it interferes with perceived American interests. One might wonder how many 'unwilling sellers' have simply needed a dose of 'regime change' to become more amenable to such 'deals.'