US 'Peace Plan' Recommends Ceding Land: Call it 'Diplomacy'
Mainstream media frames this as a pragmatic solution, ignoring that this playbook has been running for decades. Every time a major power wants an inconvenient 'conflict' to end, the weaker party is pressured to surrender land. Take the Palestinian territories: after decades of illegal Israeli settlements, occupying forces – consistently backed by US taxpayer dollars and military aid – simply
expand. Then, 'peace plans' emerge suggesting the occupied cede stolen land for a temporary cessation of hostilities. It's not a peace plan; it's a legitimization of conquest, dressed up as statesmanship. The hypocrisy isn't even subtle anymore. One might wonder if 'ceding land under its control' morphs into 'recognizing new borders' when it's convenient for US foreign policy objectives –
especially when those objectives align with powerful lobbying interests or geopolitical chess moves. How many times will we watch this script play out, with the aggressor rewarded and the victim told to 'be realistic'?