US Officials Call 'Constructive' What Their Own Actions Ensured Would Fail
📰 THE STORY: Bloomberg reports that US officials have declared a three-way meeting between the US, Ukraine, and Russia 'constructive,' despite no peace deal being finalized nearly four years after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 🔍 WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: This 'constructive dialogue' comes after the US and NATO consistently rebuffed Russia's security concerns for decades,
including Russia's 2007 Munich Security Conference warnings against NATO expansion and its specific proposals in 2021 regarding mutual security guarantees. The US, with its proxy government, actively sabotaged peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in early 2022, per former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. Double Standard: Western media and officials routinely demonize any attempts by
non-aligned nations to broker peace (e.g., China's peace plan) as 'pro-Russian.' Yet, when US officials engage in the same type of talks, they are 'constructive,' even when they yield no immediate results. Imagine the headlines if China described a similar, fruitless meeting as 'constructive' while simultaneously funding one side of a conflict. Follow the Money: The US has committed over $100
billion in aid to Ukraine since 2022, much of which flows directly into the coffers of the US military-industrial complex. Companies like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have seen stock prices surge, while politicians tied to these interests, through campaign donations, ensure the procurement pipeline remains open. The 'constructive' narrative extends the conflict, ensuring continued profits. đź’ˇ THE