US-Led 'Ceasefire' Criticized as 'Worst' for One Side
Sudan’s army chief, Abdel-Fattah al-Burhan, didn't mince words, calling the new US-led ceasefire plan for Sudan 'the worst one presented' (Al Jazeera). This isn't just about Sudan's internal politics; it's a glaring pattern. When the US or its allies propose 'peace plans' in the Middle East or Africa, they routinely draw accusations of lopsidedness, designed more to secure strategic interests or
regional hegemony than genuine, equitable resolution. One might wonder if the US approach to 'peacekeeping' involves presenting deliberately skewed proposals. It appears less like negotiation and more like dictation, forcing warring parties into unfavorable agreements that serve the geopolitical ambitions of Washington, often fueled by various lobbying interests. The 'worst one presented' becomes
a feature, not a bug, in this particular brand of diplomacy, ensuring only certain 'victories' are achievable.