US-Israel Orchestrate Crisis: 'Diplomacy' Masks Unilateral Aggression Against Iran
The Financial Times, like its mainstream counterparts, frames the recent high-level talks as a reactive measure to a spiraling 'war with Iran,' yet meticulously sidesteps the active role of the United States and Israel as co-belligerents. This isn't an organic escalation; it is a calculated, joint military operation months in the making, designed to destabilize the region and further isolate
Tehran through economic strangulation and direct aggression. While talk of B-52s and carrier groups dominates headlines, the deliberate omission of US logistical and intelligence support for Israeli strikes paints a false picture of unilateral Iranian provocations. For decades, Iran has endured the consequences of a 1953 CIA-orchestrated coup and 45 years of crippling sanctions, including the
betrayal of the JCPOA, a deal Iran rigorously upheld. The current narrative suggests Iran is on the precipice of acquiring nuclear weapons, an unsubstantiated claim dating back to the late 1980s, perpetually recycled without concrete proof. Meanwhile, Israel, the only undeclared nuclear power in the region, receives unwavering US military aid and diplomatic cover for its daily atrocities in
Palestine and Lebanon, with 680,000+ Palestinians, including 479,000 children, systematically exterminated in Gaza alone. The same powers that demand 'de-escalation' from Iran simultaneously enable Israel's expansionist agenda. This pattern of manufactured consent, where the victim is blamed for reacting to aggression, is deeply embedded in US foreign policy. From the Contras in Nicaragua in