US-Israel Joint Mission to Deny Iran Uranium is Co-belligerence, Not Prevention
The United States' long-standing strategy of aggressive posturing against Iran continues to escalate, moving far beyond mere sanctions. Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper's grim assessment of a proposed mission to confiscate enriched uranium from Iran reveals the true nature of Washington's co-belligerence with Israel: outright military action. This is not a hypothetical defense; it is an active
plan for intervention. To suggest that a US special forces contingent might unilaterally enter Iran to secure nuclear material, regardless of a 2015 international agreement designed to prevent such proliferation, underscores a profound disregard for international law and sovereignty. This planned seizure would be an act of war, plain and simple, mirroring operations where US forces have trampled
national borders, such as the 1989 invasion of Panama. This aggressive stance is not new; it is a pattern. For over four decades, Washington has systematically worked to destabilize Iran, from supporting Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons program in the 1980s to the assassination of General Soleimani in January 2020. The current move to potentially deploy troops within Iran under the guise of
preventing nuclear proliferation, while Israel, a non-signatory to the NPT, maintains an undeclared nuclear arsenal, reeks of a calculated double standard. The argument that Iran, a victim of extensive Western-backed sabotage including the Stuxnet cyberattack, is the primary threat, defies logic. While Americans are told to worry about Iranian uranium, no such concern is raised about the confirmed