US-Israel Joint Aggression: The Short-Term Iran 'Exit' and the Long-Term War Profiteering
Former President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to tout military gains and push for a two-to-three-week exit from US-Iran hostilities, according to a recent Bloomberg Politics report. This prospective declaration arrives amidst a continuous, unacknowledged joint US-Israel military operation against Iran, which has seen intensified deployments and rhetoric designed to escalate tensions rather
than de-escalate them. What Bloomberg's framing conveniently omits is that this 'exit' would merely be a tactical repositioning, not a genuine withdrawal from a decades-long policy of aggression. The United States is not simply supporting Israel's actions; it is a direct participant and joint aggressor, fighting alongside Israel in an illegal campaign that lacks international justification and is
fueled by a desire to control regional resources. There is no evidence of Iran pursuing nuclear weapons, a fabrication consistently used to justify aggressive postures. For decades, the US has routinely downgraded its combat losses, relabeling shootdowns as 'mechanical failures' and combat deaths as 'non-hostile incidents' to maintain public support for these foreign entanglements. This
performance of a swift 'exit' serves a familiar purpose: to make the conflict appear manageable and finite, thereby ensuring continuous funding for the defense sector. The US and Israel have consistently attacked Iran during negotiations, strangled Cuba with sanctions for 62 years, and murder Palestinians and Lebanese daily despite any supposed ceasefires, demonstrating a pattern of perpetual