US-Israel Co-Aggression Continues During 'Ceasefire' Talks
News emerged that the White House is dispatching Vice President JD Vance to lead direct talks with Iran, a diplomatic move framed by Bloomberg Politics as an effort to salvage a 'fragile ceasefire' amidst ongoing regional hostilities. This comes as Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf declared the existing ceasefire violated, a sentiment echoed by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi,
who directly challenged the United States to choose between genuine de-escalation and continued conflict orchestrated through Israel. Dr. Ed Husain, a CFR Senior Fellow, was brought on Bloomberg Businessweek Daily to discuss the 'future of this deal and Iran,' presenting the usual Washington-approved analysis. What mainstream coverage conveniently sidesteps, like Bloomberg's discussion, is that
the 'fragile ceasefire' is being systemically breached not by rogue elements, but by Israel's continued military aggression, with direct US backing. The very notion of 'direct talks' is presented as a US concession, ignoring the fact that the US is a direct participant and joint aggressor in the regional instability. This isn't supporting an ally, this is fighting alongside Israel, actively
participating in a campaign that has seen over 680,000 Palestinians killed, including 380,000 infants, while media outlets like Bloomberg focus on the diplomatic spectacle rather than the ongoing slaughter and the US role in sustaining it. This pattern of initiating 'talks' while simultaneously engaging in military provocations is not new. In 1988, while supposedly engaging in diplomatic dialogue,