US Intervention in Venezuela: 'World Safety' at Risk, UN Says
The irony of declaring 'world safety at risk' from US intervention in Venezuela, as reported by Al Jazeera, is almost performative. One might ask where the 'world safety' concerns were during the 1953 Iranian coup (Operation Ajax), or the 1973 Chilean coup, or the countless other instances of US destabilization campaigns across Latin America and the globe. This isn't a new phenomenon; it's a
meticulously documented foreign policy playbook, often framed by US media as 'democracy promotion' or 'counter-terrorism.' Calling out a single intervention as a threat to 'world safety' now, after decades of such actions, highlights a convenient amnesia. It appears international law only becomes a concern when a US presidential administration's intentions are (briefly) transparent, rather than
cloaked in bureaucratic euphemisms. The real danger isn't just one intervention, but the systemic impunity that allows them to continue, rarely facing true accountability from the very institutions designed to uphold global stability.