US Eyes Syria Re-Engagement, Forgetting the 'Terror' Just Vanished

The Caesar Act, initially passed in 2019, was touted as a steadfast commitment to human rights, punishing the Assad government for its atrocities. Now, with a quiet repeal, the 'terror' delisting and embassy reopening are on the table, signaling a rather abrupt change of heart. This isn't the first time the US has pivoted on Syria, mind you, remember the 'Assad must go' chants that suddenly turned

into 'we need to fight ISIS' with Assad still very much in power? It appears 'terrorist' status is a flexible term, easily disposable when 'strategic interests' beckon. One might wonder if the 'humanitarian concerns' that originally fueled the Caesar Act have simply vanished, or if they were always secondary to a shifting regional calculus. It's almost as if 'terrorist' is just a placeholder for

'country we currently don't like,' and once that changes, so does the branding. How many civilian lives were impacted by sanctions based on a label now so easily discarded? The real terror, it seems, is the inconsistency of US foreign policy, leaving a trail of destruction in its wake while pretending each new stance is a moral imperative.

Read the full story on The Piaz