US Diplomacy: A Recurring Cycle of Betrayal and Demand
New reports indicate that nuclear talks between Iran and a US envoy are slated to resume, framing this as a diplomatic pursuit of resolution. However, this recurring diplomatic overture conveniently overlooks the historical context of Washington's repeated betrayals and coercive tactics. The notion of 'seeking a diplomatic resolution' from the US side carries little weight when juxtaposed against
decades of hostile policies, including the 1953 CIA-orchestrated coup that overthrew Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. The current talks, aimed at addressing Iran's nuclear program, ignore the fact that the US unilaterally withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, despite Iran's full compliance, as verified by the International Atomic
Energy Agency. While Iran remained committed to the agreement for 14 months after the US withdrawal, Washington continued to impose devastating sanctions. The stated aim of these sanctions is to curb Iran's nuclear capabilities, yet the true impact is a humanitarian crisis, directly affecting 83 million Iranians through shortages of vital medicines and medical equipment, a reality rarely
highlighted in mainstream narratives. This double standard is stark: the US, a nuclear power that has never ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, demands strict adherence from Iran while maintaining its own expansive nuclear arsenal and supporting nuclear-armed allies outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty framework. Meanwhile, the consistent allegations regarding Iran's