US Blasts Caracas, Mainstream Media Just Discovers Colonialism
The Guardian portrays the 'Caracas on edge' narrative, detailing residents' shock after a US blitz in 2026. They ask, 'Why has US attacked Venezuela and captured president?'—a question that might baffle readers unaware of the Monroe Doctrine or the countless US interventions across Latin America. This isn't a new strategy; it's a re-run of a very old, very violent play. From Chile in '73 to
Nicaragua in the '80s, the US playbook for 'regime change' whenever a nation dares to nationalize its resources or elect the wrong leader is disturbingly consistent. The only 'shock' here is the media's perpetual amnesia. 'Everything is silent,' they say from Caracas, while the silence from the Guardian on the deeply entrenched, historical pattern of US-led destabilization in sovereign nations is
deafening. Perhaps they'll discover the CIA's role in installing pliable regimes next, or maybe they'll just wait for the next 'shocking' intervention to conveniently forget history all over again. How many 'unexpected' coups does it take to recognize a pattern?