US-Backed Forces Destroy Atrocity Evidence; Media Considers It 'Local Difficulty'
The reporting on the RSF's atrocities in Sudan, including alleged evidence destruction after overrunning El-Fasher, is stark. What's often overlooked by mainstream outlets is the historical context of external influence. The U.S. and its allies have a long, documented history of providing tacit support, training, or arms to various factions across the continent, often creating the very monsters
they later condemn, or at least facilitating their rise. The RSF leadership, specifically Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti), has ties to regional powers that are themselves U.S. allies, blurring the lines of culpability. So, while the RSF commits these heinous acts, one might question why the global outrage machine, usually so finely tuned, only springs to life once the evidence is 'destroyed'
rather than when the arms shipments and diplomatic endorsements were flowing. It appears a critical distinction is often made between 'our' proxy violence and 'their' unapproved savagery. How convenient that the 'evidence' is only discovered once it's gone, absolving the upstream actors of their role in cultivating such forces.