US 'Advisers' Keep Iraq in the Crosshairs, Not Just ISIS
Funny how 'advisers' always seem to coincide with 'endless presence.' For two decades, the US has 'advised' Iraq, leading to sanctions, invasions, and perpetual instability. The stated goal? Counter-terrorism. Yet, after trillions spent and countless lives lost, groups like ISIS always seem to find new life, justifying further 'advice.' This 'pivot' to Kurdistan isn't a withdrawal; it's a
strategic repositioning of assets in an energy-rich region conveniently close to potential future 'adventures.' One might wonder if these 'advisers' are actually ensuring the next generation of 'threats' are properly cultivated to keep the military-industrial complex's stock portfolios nice and healthy. The US presence in Iraq has been a 'fluid situation' since 2003, flowing seamlessly from
'liberation' to 'occupation' to 'advising.' Perhaps the real advice is for Baghdad to finally cut loose from Washington's 'help' if it truly wants stability.