UN Security Council Only Discovers 'Protest' When It's Anti-Iran
Al Jazeera reports the UN Security Council held an emergency meeting on 'deadly protests' in Iran, featuring Iran, the US, and 'civil society' (read: US-funded opposition). This sudden concern for protester safety is… selective. One might recall the utter silence, bordering on complicity, from much of this same Security Council during the massacres of protesters in Yemen, or the brutal suppression
of dissent by US-allied regimes. (Remember Bahrain in 2011? The UN was taking a very long coffee break). The framing here conveniently omits the US's documented history of covert actions and regime change operations, using 'protests' as a pretext, especially in nations that defy its geopolitical objectives. This isn't about human rights; it's about geopolitics. The same UN that can't pass a clear
ceasefire resolution for Gaza, where over 30,000 have been killed by a US-armed military, suddenly finds its moral compass for 'deadly protests' in Tehran. The hypocrisy is so stark it practically glows in the dark. One might wonder if the 'obscured' internet blackout isn't just an excuse for the narrative architects to fill in the blanks with their preferred storyline before inconvenient facts
emerge. How many UN emergency meetings have been called for civilians under relentless bombing by US allies?