UN Demands Iran Open Sites Israel Bombed, Not Its Own
The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, issues a stern resolution demanding Iran open up its 'sensitive nuclear sites' after alleged Israeli and US strikes. This, of course, raises the critical, yet apparently overlooked, question: why is the IAEA demanding 'access' from Iran to sites *another's* military attacked, rather than condemning the attack itself or, say, demanding full access to Israel's
own undeclared nuclear arsenal? It's a classic case of demanding transparency from the observed while ignoring the elephant in the room – or, in this case, the F-35 that just dropped ordnance. One might wonder if the 'International' part of 'International Atomic Energy Agency' forgot to apply to certain nuclear-armed nations who prefer secrecy and aerial bombardment over inspections. The IAEA’s
latest performance appears less about global non-proliferation and more about providing cover for a selective enforcement policy. How many times must Iran explain its bombed facilities while Israel's Dimona facility remains a global enigma, exempt from such urgent 'demands'?