Trump Pushes Iran Strikes While Media Forgets Who Funds the Push
While the media focuses on intra-administration squabbles, they neglect the decades-long, bipartisan campaign for confrontation with Iran. This isn't just Trump's whim; it's a consistent demand echoed by groups like AIPAC, who poured over $3 million into congressional races in 2022 alone, ensuring a compliant chorus for escalating tensions. Why does 'diplomacy' only become an option after years of
demonization, sanctions, and military threats, often championed by politicians who receive significant financial backing from hawkish foreign policy lobbies? One might call it a peculiar coincidence. The media's framing suggests Trump is an anomaly in his aggression, but the push for regime change in Iran has been a Washington staple long before him, supported by a political class well-greased to
ignore diplomatic avenues. It begs the question: is it truly 'Trump pushing for strikes,' or 'Trump saying out loud what his donors want him to do'?