Trump 'Intervention' on Iran: Déjà Vu, Courtesy of MSM
When the Financial Times presents 'Iranians defying intensifying crackdown' and suggests 'Trump considers intervention,' one might recall previous chapters from the U.S. foreign policy playbook ( Financial Times ). This isn't just about 'protests'; it's about a consistent, documented pattern of amplifying dissent in adversary nations while downplaying internal resistance in allies. The "Trump
considers intervention" headline is less a revelation and more a dog whistle for a regime change agenda that has historically destabilized entire regions—a legacy conveniently unmentioned in most mainstream analyses. Remember the 'interventions' in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, often prefaced by similar media framings of internal strife? The U.S. has poured billions into destabilizing Iran through
various fronts, including covert operations and sanctions that cripple the populace. The Financial Times headline sounds less like reporting and more like stage-setting for the next act of a play we've all seen before. How many times must the 'will of the people' be invoked by external powers before we recognize the recurring plot?