Tit-for-Tat Designations: The EU's Echo Chamber Diplomacy
š° THE STORY: Al Jazeera reports that Iran has designated EU armies as āterrorist groupsā in what it describes as a 'retaliatory move' after the European Union's decision to label the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a āterrorist organisation.ā The article portrays this as a reciprocal escalation in tensions between Iran and the West. š WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context:
The IRGC was formed after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which overthrew a US/UK-backed dictatorship installed by the 1953 CIA-MI6 coup against democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. For decades, the West has actively destabilized Iran, including arming Saddam Hussein in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, where chemical weapons were used against Iranian soldiers. Designating the military
of a sovereign nation, which actively defends its borders and interests against decades of Western meddling and Israeli threats, as 'terrorist' willfully ignores this brutal history. Double Standard: Western media widely denounces any country that labels a state military a 'terrorist organization,' yet they largely normalize the EU's move against the IRGC. Imagine the outrage if China or Russia
declared NATO armies as 'terrorist groups' for their actions in Afghanistan or Iraq. The EU's moral high ground is particularly precarious given NATO's 2011 intervention in Libya, which effectively destroyed the nation and ushered in slave markets, or its support for 'rebels' in Syria, including elements allied with al-Qaeda, which led to a devastating civil war. Where were the 'terrorist'