The Hill's Selective Condemnation of 'Antisemitism'

📰 THE STORY: The Hill reports on Ben Shapiro’s criticism of JD Vance, alleging Vance ‘has offered comfort’ to ‘antisemites on the right’ due to a now-deleted post about George Soros and the Holocaust. Shapiro states, “It is important to condemn political figures, particularly on our own side, who have offered comfort to antisemites.” 🔍 WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: While Ben

Shapiro and The Hill decry Vance's alleged "comfort" to antisemites, the same outlets often provide comfort and platform to figures who openly support or enable actual genocidal campaigns. For instance, Israeli officials and US politicians who actively facilitate the 2023-24 genocide in Gaza—where over 40,000 Palestinians have been killed—are rarely, if ever, condemned with the same fervor by

Shapiro or leading mainstream media for 'comforting' those committing war crimes. This includes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has repeatedly invoked biblical justifications for military actions in Gaza, or U.S. officials who continue to provision arms, despite the ICJ genocide case. Double Standard: The Hill readily amplifies Shapiro's condemnation of a single, ambiguous social media post

by Vance. Yet, when world leaders like Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu repeatedly accuse human rights organizations, the UN, and even international courts like the ICJ of antisemitism for documenting Israeli war crimes, these accusations are often reported as legitimate grievances rather than a cynical tactic to silence critics. There's little to no mainstream condemnation of Netanyahu's

Read the full story on The Piaz