The Hill's Opinion Section: Where 'Guilt by Association' for Immigrants is Bad, But Israel Is Always Good
When it comes to immigrants, The Hill rightly criticizes the unfair targeting based on the actions of a few. Yet, this careful distinction often evaporates in their coverage of the Middle East. Consider the pervasive narrative that Iran 'controls' various groups in the region, conveniently justifying disproportionate responses and endless conflict, rather than acknowledging sovereign actors or
local grievances. This selective application of moral principles isn't just an oversight; it's a feature of a media landscape that prioritizes certain geopolitical narratives. One might wonder if 'guilt by association' only becomes problematic when it affects voting blocs or policy positions not aligned with establishment foreign policy. The hypocrisy isn't subtle; it's glaring. While The Hill
champions fair treatment for immigrants, they often echo the worn-out State Department talking points that paint entire populations, whether in Gaza or Yemen, with a single, hostile brushstroke.