The Hill Discovers ICE Actions Spark 'Fury, Divisions' – Shocking!
When ICE agents open fire, injuring a citizen during an arrest (as the linked article details), The Hill breathlessly reports that this 'sparks fury, divisions.' This journalistic observation is, of course, utterly groundbreaking given decades of ICE's operational history. It's almost as if the agency's very mandate—detaining and deporting individuals, often with aggressive tactics—has
consistently generated, dare we say, 'divisions' and 'fury' long before a bullet became headline news. Perhaps The Hill is just now catching up to the fact that militarizing immigration enforcement, a policy increasingly funded by bipartisan Congressional approval, tends to agitate the populace. One might charitably suggest they've been too occupied, perhaps, investigating the precise shade of
lipstick worn by Marjorie Taylor Greene. Or maybe, just maybe, the 'fury' and 'divisions' are not a sudden outcome, but a predictable response to the institutionalized violence sanctioned by the very politicians The Hill covers daily. What startling insight awaits us next? That fire is hot?