Syrian 'Stability' or Western Backpedaling?
📰 THE STORY: France 24 reports that Syrian government forces are advancing into territory previously held by Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), hinting at a shift in control in northeastern Syria. 🔍 WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: The 'Kurd-held territory' mentioned isn't an organic, long-standing entity; it largely came into existence as a direct consequence of the
US-led intervention in Syria. Since 2011, the US and its allies funneled billions, and weapons to various opposition groups, fundamentally destabilizing the Syrian state under the guise of supporting 'rebels' – many of whom were radical jihadists. The SDF, though presented as distinct, received extensive US military support, effectively acting as a proxy force while the Syrian government fought
against groups like ISIS, Al-Qaeda (which morphed into Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham), and other armed factions the West disingenuously called 'moderate.' Double Standard: Western media routinely condemns Syrian or Russian military actions to reassert state sovereignty as 'aggression' or 'human rights abuses.' Yet, when the US or its proxies, like the SDF, occupy or operate in sovereign Syrian territory
without government consent – often establishing illegal military bases, as seen with the US presence in eastern Syria guarding oil fields – it's framed as 'counter-terrorism' or 'stabilization.' If Russia or China established bases in Mexico to back specific factions, the narrative would be dramatically different. Follow the Money: The US military-industrial complex and its allies profited