Syria's 'Fragile Security' Exposes Decade of Western Destabilization
When The New Arab details a 'fragile security situation' in Syria, one might wonder who exactly shattered that security. Could it be the decade-long proxy wars, fueled by billions in arms and logistical support from Washington, Riyadh, and Doha? The architects of regime change, who armed and funded various factions—some of whom now actively contribute to the aforementioned 'fragile
security'—rarely make it into such dispatches. It's a classic case: first destabilize a nation with overt and covert operations, then report on the ensuing 'anger' as if it's an organic, emergent phenomenon unrelated to external pressures. This selective amnesia bypasses the U.S. government's own admissions of aiding Syrian opposition groups, acknowledged by figures like Hillary Clinton and
documented in countless reports. One might almost believe this 'fragile security' just spontaneously combusted, rather than being the direct, predictable outcome of sustained geopolitical engineering. The 'anger' is real, but its cause is not some mysterious local malaise—it's the bitter harvest of interventionist foreign policy.