Sudan's 'Civil War' Narrative Obscures Global Proxy Battle for Africa's Resources
📰 THE STORY: Al-Monitor reports that drone attacks are escalating in al-Obeid, central Sudan, signaling the civil war's expansion, with residents confirming significant civilian casualties as the conflict inches closer to this vital city. 🔍 WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: The current chaos didn't emerge from a vacuum. Sudan has been a battleground for external powers for
decades. In 2011, South Sudan (rich in oil) seceded with heavy Western backing, leaving a fragmented Sudan vulnerable. More recently, the US delisted Sudan as a state sponsor of terror in late 2020, just months before a military coup in October 2021 that sidelined the civilian government, illustrating a pattern of 'carrot and stick' diplomacy often preceding instability. Russia, the UAE, and
various Western powers have all been vying for influence and access to Sudan's vast natural resources, including gold, uranium, and strategic Red Sea ports. Double Standard: When 'freedom fighters' in Ukraine (backed by NATO) use drones, it's hailed as heroic resistance. Yet, when similar tactics are employed in Sudan, it's simply 'war,' devoid of geopolitical context or external arming. The West
condemns Russian 'aggression' but remains largely silent on the intricate web of foreign backing for various factions in Sudan, effectively sanitizing the role of its own allies and arms manufacturers in fueling the conflict. The US State Department offers vague condemnations while arms flow freely into the region, often from 'allies' who benefit from the chaos. Follow the Money: Who profits from