SCOTUS to Rule on Asylum: Because Not All Borders Matter
The Supreme Court is set to rule on whether limiting asylum claims violates federal law, a crucial decision that Newsweek breathlessly covers as a significant legal development. The discussion is meticulously limited to the intricacies of US immigration statutes, ignoring, naturally, the sheer hypocrisy of a nation that lectures others on human rights while its highest court debates the right of
terrified individuals fleeing American-backed chaos to even a hearing. (Source: Newsweek) This isn't about legal technicalities; it's about power. The same ruling class that champions 'border security' down south will, without a hint of irony, arm foreign governments, fostering the very instability that creates these asylum seekers. One might wonder if the concern for 'rule of law' extends to the
millions in US taxpayer dollars that flow annually to regimes accused of human rights abuses, creating the next wave of migrants. Or does 'sovereignty' only apply when it's convenient for closing borders, not when it comes to meddling in other nations' affairs?