Rand Paul's 'MAGA Agenda': Still No Venezuela Regime Change?
The article suggests Paul's skepticism about regime change in Venezuela aligns with a non-interventionist 'MAGA' wing. What's omitted? Paul, like many, often criticizes intervention until it's politically convenient or when the MIC (Military-Industrial Complex) whispers alluringly. The US has a long, documented history of attempts to destabilize governments from Allende's Chile in 1973 to Maduro's
Venezuela today. It's not about 'MAGA' or 'Democrat' agendas; it's about persistent geopolitical maneuvering, often fueled by corporate interests, dressed up as 'democracy promotion.' Remember when Donald Trump himself—the architect of 'MAGA'—openly considered military intervention in Venezuela, and his administration recognized Juan Guaidó as the interim president? The 'real MAGA agenda' on
Venezuela, it appears, was regime change-lite, cloaked in sanctions that immiserated the populace while failing to dislodge Maduro. Senator Paul's sudden concern for non-intervention now begs the question: How many 'MAGA' figures actually stood against that?