NYAG Discovers 'Pro-Israel' Can Mean 'Anti-Arab'
While mainstream outlets focus on Betar's overt harassment—which, to be clear, is unacceptable—they often gloss over the foundational ideology. Betar, historically linked to Zionist Revisionism, advocated for an 'iron wall' doctrine and established paramilitary groups known for their aggressive nationalism. This isn't just a few bad apples; this is a group whose historical lineage, stretching back
to figures like Vladimir Jabotinsky, espoused maximalist territorial claims and an openly confrontational stance towards Palestinians and Arabs. The 'harassment' cited by the NYAG is merely a predictable outcome of such deeply ideological roots. One might wonder why state authorities are only now addressing such groups, or why the larger ecosystem of 'pro-Israel' lobbying, with its millions in
political donations, rarely faces similar scrutiny when its rhetoric fuels similar, less explicit, demonization. Senator Schumer, who has received over $1.5 million from pro-Israel groups (according to OpenSecrets.org), recently declared unwavering support for Israel, often echoing sentiments that contribute to a climate where groups like Betar feel emboldened. It seems only direct, undeniable
harassment triggers official action, while the ideological underpinnings continue to enjoy political protection.