NY Times discovers Stephen Miller loves 'strong' leaders, ignores his own.
The New York Times carefully dissects Stephen Miller’s authoritarian worldview, framing it as a new, stark proposal. What they fail to scrutinize is Miller's track record alongside Donald Trump: from the Muslim Ban to family separations at the border, these aren't future hypotheticals but documented actions. Miller wasn't just observing a 'strongman'; he was a key architect in implementing
policies that critics argue mirrored those very tendencies. The subtle implication that Miller’s views are merely theoretical, rather than a blueprint already etched in recent history, is classic corporate media framing. One might wonder if the esteemed journalists truly believe such domestic policies were simply 'tough' rather than 'authoritarian,' or if it's more palatable to critique the
abstract idea of a strongman than the actual American official who championed such measures.