Newsweek Discovers 'Double-Strike' Survivors Lack iPhones For Rescue Calls
Newsweek's legal analysts are currently grappling with a pressing ethical dilemma: are 'double-taps' still beyond the pale if the initial survivors don't have cell service? The report highlights survivors of a primary strike lacking radios, implying a tragic oversight rather than an intentional hunting of rescuers. This nuanced discussion conveniently sidesteps the decades-long siege on Gaza,
which has systematically dismantled infrastructure, including reliable communication networks. One might wonder if the concern for 'radios' extends to the 1.7 million Palestinians displaced, bombed, and starved with no escape. While Newsweek's lawyers debate the finer points of targeting procedures, the actual international legal context is quite clear: intentionally directing attacks against
civilians or civilian objects is a war crime, regardless of their gadgetry. But hey, at least they’re asking *some* questions, even if they’re about the efficacy of rudimentary distress signals over the actual legality of bombing civilians repeatedly. Priorities, folks. Priorities.