NATO Nation Builds Bunkers, Not Bridges, on Russian Border
Newsweek reports Estonia, a NATO member, has begun constructing fortifications on its Russian border, citing 'deterrence.' This mirrors a familiar pattern where NATO's relentless eastward creep, absorbing former Warsaw Pact nations and establishing military infrastructure ever closer to Russia's doorstep, is conveniently omitted from the narrative. After all, who needs historical context when you
can just print 'Russia bad'? Critics might point out that if Russia decided to build defensive positions along, say, Mexico's border with the U.S. (hypothetically, of course, no one's suggesting that!), the mainstream press wouldn't call it 'deterrence.' They'd call it an 'unacceptable provocation' and a 'threat to national security.' But when NATO does it, it's just a 'sovereign nation's right to
defend itself.' How many 'defensive' expansions does it take to start a war?