Morocco's 'Rule of Law' Charade: When Lawyers Become the Next 'Problem'
THE ACTORS: Who is involved in this story? Moroccan Government: Specifically, the Ministry of Justice, pushing for the new draft law. Their stated aim is to 'modernize' the legal profession, increase efficiency, and enhance 'public trust.' Moroccan National Bar Association (ANAM): Representing over 14,000 lawyers, leading the protests. They view the bill as an attempt to undermine judicial
independence and legal immunity. King Mohammed VI: As the ultimate authority in Morocco, his implicit or explicit approval underpins such significant legislative pushes. His decrees often bypass parliamentary debate entirely, allowing for rapid policy shifts. THE FUNDING: Where does their money come from? Moroccan Government: Funded by state revenue, including taxes, phosphate exports, and
significant foreign aid. For instance, the U.S. provided over $450 million in aid to Morocco in 2023, often tied to 'governance' and 'security cooperation' initiatives (USAID, 2023). European Union funding also heavily supports Moroccan state institutions. This external funding can sometimes be leveraged to project an image of stability and reform, even as internal dissent is suppressed. Lawyers'
Associations: Funded by membership dues and professional fees. Their financial independence allows them to maintain a critical stance largely free from direct state financial pressure, which is precisely what the new law seeks to erode by potentially placing their regulatory body under tighter government control. THE INCENTIVES: What do they gain from this narrative? Government's Incentive: