Mainstream Media Shocked People Object to US-Brokered Slaughter
Al-Monitor reports 'hard-right' Pakistani Islamists are marching on Islamabad after 'violent clashes' over a 'US-brokered ceasefire' between Israel and Hamas. The framing implies irrational fury, conveniently omitting one critical detail: the 'ceasefire' mentioned comes after Israel’s campaign in Gaza resulted in over 37,000 Palestinian deaths, primarily women and children, according to Gaza's
Health Ministry, and widespread destruction. The 'ceasefire' terminology itself is a rhetorical sleight of hand, used by media to sanitize what many perceive as a catastrophic failure of international diplomacy rather than a genuine peace effort. One might wonder if the 'violent clashes' are less about religious extremism and more about profound moral outrage at global complicity. The US, which
brokered this so-called ceasefire, simultaneously greenlights billions in arms to Israel, with groups like AIPAC contributing millions to politicians who then approve these aid packages. The media narrative conveniently overlooks this context, preferring to label any significant protest as simply 'Islamist,' thus dismissing legitimate grievances born from immense human suffering. How many
'ceasefires' does it take before the world admits it's really an endorsement of ongoing violence?