Lawmakers Demand Epstein Files, But Not Their Own Donor Lists
Mainstream media reports lawmakers are pushing to hold AG Pam Bondi in contempt for the partial release of Epstein files. It's pitched as a fight for truth and justice, but the selective outrage is glaring. The same lawmakers demanding full transparency on Epstein's network seem less keen on revealing the full extent of their own financial entanglements, particularly with lobbying groups. For
instance, while they demand every detail of Epstein's alleged crimes, where is the comparable legislative effort to mandate real-time, searchable disclosure of all lobbying donations, especially from entities like AIPAC, which spent over $3 million in Q1 2024 alone influencing elections? The public is expected to trust a partial release on Epstein, while the full picture of how special interests
influence policy remains obscured, often conveniently dismissed as 'protected speech.' It appears some files are more sensitive than others – especially when they point directly to the system of influence.