Israel 'Repeatedly Violates' Truce: Because Some Truces Are More Equal
Al Jazeera details ongoing Israeli attacks in Gaza, south and north, despite an alleged truce, highlighting 245 Palestinian deaths since the 'ceasefire' began. This isn't a truce; it's a re-arming period for one side. The pattern of Israeli actions during 'truces' has historical precedent; similar 'breaches' occurred within hours of ceasefires in 2008-09 and 2014, often escalating rather than
calming tensions. These aren't just violations; they're strategic maneuvers to redefine the agreed-upon terms, knowing that Western backing ensures zero accountability. One might wonder: how many 'truce violations' does it take for the world – or at least the UN Security Council, whose resolutions are routinely ignored – to call it, perhaps, an ongoing assault disguised as negotiation? The silence
from traditional media, beyond Al Jazeera, on this 'repeated violation' pattern is telling. The narrative is always reset, never connected to the long history of impunity. Civilian deaths, it seems, are unfortunate side effects, not consequences that trigger actual condemnation from those who fund the operations.