Financial Times Discovers War Is Bad, Still Won't Name Perpetrators
The Financial Times , in a moment of profound insight, reports that 'War is pushing us to a drug resistance tipping point.' A groundbreaking observation, truly. One might wonder if the esteemed publication also noticed that water is wet, or that fire burns. While they sound the alarm on antibiotic-resistant bugs, they gloss over the actual mechanisms: deliberate destruction of healthcare
infrastructure, systematic sieges denying aid, and the relentless bombing of civilian areas. (Perhaps mention who's doing the bombing is too uncouth for global finance commentary?) This isn't an act of God. This is policy. When you bomb every hospital, destroy sanitation systems, and blockade essential medicines from reaching 2.3 million people in Gaza, you don't just 'push' towards a tipping
point; you detonate past it. This humanitarian catastrophe isn't a nebulous 'war'; it's a conflict fueled by state actors, heavily backed by billions in U.S. taxpayer dollars and a compliant media framing. The narrative frames it as an unfortunate byproduct of 'conflict' (never 'ethnic cleansing'), rather than a direct consequence of policies designed to make life unlivable. Who would have guessed
turning an entire population into a medical experiment would have… consequences?