Feds Use Bot-Generated Lies, Calls It 'Immigration Enforcement'
The Independent reports U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis blasted immigration agents after discovering factual discrepancies between their ChatGPT-generated reports and actual body camera footage. (Because why bother with reality when an algorithm can just hallucinate documents for you?) This isn't just about lazy writing; it's about a systematized indifference to due process, where convenience
trumps accuracy in matters of human liberty. Just last year, Congress allocated nearly $57 billion to ICE and CBP, yet they can't manage fact-checking basic reports manually. One might wonder if the next AI innovation will be a chatbot that generates detention orders, bypassing inconvenient legal procedures altogether. Given the history of US immigration policy—from family separations under 'zero
tolerance' to the continued expansion of detention facilities—inaccurate AI reports seem less like an anomaly and more like an integral feature of a system designed for detachment. After all, if the truth is too inconvenient, why not just generate a more pliable version?