EU Discovers Diplomacy After Fueling Conflict for Two Years
Mainstream outlets are cautiously reporting the EU's sudden 'realization' that perhaps diplomacy with Russia isn't such a bad idea after all. This volte-face, framed by some as a nuanced strategic shift, conveniently omits the two years of aggressive escalation driven by US and European interests, funneling billions into a proxy war. It's almost as if the 'hawks' who demanded Russia be isolated
and crushed only remembered the concept of 'dialogue' when their own economies started buckling or when the tide of conflict didn't quite turn as planned. One might wonder if their commitment to 'democratic values' extends only as far as their quarterly energy reports. This isn't a sudden epiphany; it's a strategic retreat. It's the same playbook used across every ill-conceived Western
intervention – push for regime change, arm proxies, and when it inevitably backfires, quietly pivot to 'negotiation' while whitewashing the immense human and financial cost. The loudest voices for isolating Russia weren't just ideologues; they were often connected to military-industrial complex interests. Funny how 'peace talks' only become palatable when the war machine starts looking less
profitable, or when public fatigue finally forces a PR change.