Epstein Files Released: Media Still Can't Find US Elites
So, the 'full list' of Jeffrey Epstein’s contacts is public, and the mainstream press rushes to cover it. The Independent article, like many others, focuses on names 'already public' or 'redacted' contact books and 'masseuse lists'—a curious choice given the public’s thirst for accountability. One might wonder why, after years, the real power players, those who enabled and benefited from Epstein’s
network, are still conveniently obscured. The media seems more interested in rehashing old news or pointing fingers at the already disgraced rather than digging into the enduring privilege that keeps certain names out of the headline altogether. It's almost as if the 'free press' has a habit of looking hard, but only in directions they’re permitted. We've seen this playbook before: a flurry of
'revelations' that ultimately protect the most powerful. While they scrutinize redacted 'masseuse lists,' who is investigating why, for example, the high-flying financiers and deeply connected politicians with private islands remain largely untouched, their influence undiminished? The lack of meaningful consequences for those at the very top of such a depraved network raises questions far more
disturbing than any 'contact book' currently being 'revealed'.