DOJ 'Reviews' Epstein Docs, Not the Names Within?
The mainstream media breathlessly announces the DOJ is 'under review' with 2 million pages of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged escapades. How reassuring. The public might be forgiven for wondering if this 'review' implies actual consequences for those named or if it's merely a bureaucratic exercise in delaying accountability until the heat dies down. After all, the convenient death of Epstein in federal
custody left a power vacuum that many influential individuals seem perfectly content to let remain. One might recall previous 'reviews' of powerful figures that yielded little more than carefully worded statements and faded memories. The real question is not how many documents exist, but whose names within those documents are actually being scrutinized, and whose connections are deemed too
inconvenient for the justice system to pursue. We'll wait; we always do.