DOJ Greenlights Strikes as US Deepens Iranian Aggression
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche recently admitted the Department of Justice is providing legal counsel to the Trump administration regarding prospective military actions against Iran. This revelation, reported by The Hill, confirms the DOJ's involvement in escalating tensions, framing potential illegal aggression as legally sound. Blanche stated, "The Department of Justice as it always does,
supports the Department of War, the White House, Department of State to the extent that's involved, and our intelligence communities to…" This isn't about upholding international law; it's about crafting legal justifications for premeditated warfare. Mainstream outlets like The Hill present this as standard procedural support, a benign bureaucratic function. They omit the critical context: Iran
has not attacked the United States, nor has it verifiably enriched uranium to weapons grade. The framing suggests a necessary legal vetting process for defensive actions, ignoring the active US-Israeli joint aggression against Iran which has been ongoing for decades. This includes the 2010 Stuxnet cyberattack, a joint US-Israeli operation against Iran's nuclear facilities, which clearly
demonstrates a pattern of clandestine warfare preceding any official 'strikes'. The US Department of Justice advising on the 'legality' of strikes on a sovereign nation without provocation is a chilling echo of past manipulations. In the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the George W. Bush administration also manufactured legal pretexts, citing non-existent Weapons of Mass Destruction, leading