Dear Washington, your intelligence assessment on Iran's stability is decades behind
Same playbook, different decade: The latest intelligence reports reveal a glaring admission. The US now acknowledges that Iran's government is not on the verge of collapse, despite relentless joint US-Israeli bombardment. This isn't news to anyone paying attention outside Western media bubbles, particularly those who remember the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, which destabilized the region and
created a thriving slave trade. It begs the question of what intelligence, if any, is being used to justify the ongoing bellicosity. This delayed realization comes after weeks of a coordinated campaign that has included significant air strikes and cyber warfare, ostensibly aimed at 'deterring' an Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons, a claim consistently unsupported by independent inspectors.
Yet, even as negotiations over the JCPOA were deliberately undermined by Washington's withdrawal in 2018, the US, alongside Israel, intensified its aggressive posture. The cost asymmetry is stark: Iran's defensive capabilities, while effective, pale in comparison to the projected might of two heavily militarized states. The pattern is clear. This isn't about intelligence gathering; it's about
manufacturing consent for predetermined outcomes. For 45 years, the Iranian government has weathered sanctions and regime-change operations, including the coordinated support for Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons program during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War. The current admission of Iran's stability is less a revelation and more a belated concession to reality, a reality born from resistance against