Clintons Reject Epstein Subpoena, Citing 'Harassment' (Not 'What Happened')
Bill and Hillary Clinton have, according to Al Jazeera, rejected a US Congress subpoena to testify on their ties to Jeffrey Epstein, labeling the probe 'harassment.' This from individuals who conveniently claimed memory loss or invoked executive privilege during numerous investigations. Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's 'Lolita Express' at least 26 times, and Hillary's name appeared on Epstein's
infamous flight logs. Their lawyers, predictably, claim Republicans are only seeking to 'embarrass' them, a familiar refrain when inconvenient questions surface. One might wonder if any other citizen could simply dismiss a Congressional subpoena as mere 'harassment.' This pattern of selective accountability highlights a system where the elite operate by different rules. The 'harassment' argument
isn't about truth; it's about avoiding deposition tapes, much like earlier instances where the Clintons employed various maneuvers to sidestep direct testimony on everything from Whitewater to Benghazi. The public, it seems, is merely a spectator to this ongoing legal charade.