CIA Discovers Oil-Rich Nations Prefer Stability Over US-Backed Chaos
The Hill dutifully reports the CIA's earth-shattering revelation: that Maduro loyalists are the most likely to lead Venezuela. This comes after years of US-backed coup attempts, crippling sanctions, and the absurd recognition of Juan Guaidó as 'interim president' – a man who, let's not forget, was barely recognized within Venezuela itself. The same CIA that engineered countless coups across Latin
America now acknowledges the 'futility' of opposition efforts, perhaps realizing that regime change is harder when the target actually has popular support, or at least a military that won't flip. One might wonder if the US intelligence community has finally read a history book. Or perhaps they simply needed to secure Venezuelan oil amidst geopolitical shifts, making 'stability' suddenly more
appealing than 'freedom' (which, translated from US foreign policy, usually means 'compliance'). It appears the goal wasn't actually fostering democracy, but controlling resources, and when a coup fails, 'pragmatism' becomes the new narrative. It’s almost as if endless foreign meddling only creates conditions for the very 'authoritarianism' we claim to oppose.