China's 'Purges' and Western Obsession: A Masterclass in Selective Scrutiny

šŸ“° THE STORY: The Financial Times reports that China is investigating the last two military leaders who had previously survived other ā€˜purges,’ suggesting that President Xi Jinping is consolidating absolute operational control over the People’s Liberation Army through these actions. šŸ” WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU: Historical Context: Leadership transitions and consolidation are common in all

political systems. Consider the numerous U.S. administrations, from Nixon's 'enemies list' to Trump's rapid cycling of cabinet members, all designed to ensure loyalty and consolidate power. Or the 1976 CIA-backed coup in Argentina, where 30,000 disappeared in Pinochet's consolidation of power, a fact the Western media largely downplayed at the time. Yet, internal Chinese anti-corruption efforts,

often targeting genuine malfeasance, are framed solely as 'purges.' Double Standard: Western media labels internal power shifts in China as 'purges' or 'authoritarian crackdowns,' while similar moves by U.S. or allied leaders—like the wholesale replacement of civil servants after a new administration or the aggressive targeting of whistleblowers (e.g., Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning)—are either

ignored or presented as necessary governance. When Milei in Argentina purges his financial ministers at the IMF's behest and enacts draconian austerity, it's 'economic reform,' not a 'purge' of dissenters within the state apparatus. Follow the Money: The narrative of an 'unstable' or 'authoritarian' China directly benefits global arms manufacturers and defense contractors, particularly those in

Read the full story on The Piaz