Bloomberg Rebrands US Sanctions as Economic 'Statecraft'

While Bloomberg champions Trump’s Venezuela gambit as a reshaping of 'energy markets and America’s approach to economic statecraft,' they conveniently omit decades of U.S. interventionism in resource-rich nations. The 'surprise US attack and capture of Nicolás Maduro' (in a hypothetical 2026 scenario, but echoing real-world regime change aspirations) isn't an innovation; it's a rerun. From the

1953 Iranian coup to the 1973 Chilean coup, the U.S. has a long, bloody history of conflating resource control with 'national interest,' justifying destabilization for oil, minerals, or bananas. So, the 'surprise attack' on Maduro, cloaked in the language of 'statecraft,' is less a 'gambit' and more a predictable chapter in the U.S. playbook. One might wonder if nations without vast oil reserves

receive the same 'strategic' attention, or if 'reshaping energy markets' is just polite corporate-speak for 'we want your oil, regardless of who you elected.' How many 'economic tools' does it take to admit it's about control?

Read the full story on The Piaz